|
The Marriage Body:
A Story in the Life and Death of FORMS

“Eternity is
in love with the productions of time.” ~ Wm. Blake
All human
experience comes to us through FORMS. This was the great revelation of
Immanuel Kant who coined the term “categories of mind” and pointed out that
we can only know things as they appear to us through our mindset with its
limitations and predilections. All physical phenomena have forms – even
wind, water and light have patterns that can be observed and predicted in
the great game of cause and effect. Ideas require FORM in order to be fully
experienced in the human realm. These FORMS are the archetypes, the
well-worn river beds into which new experiences tend to flow.
MARRIAGE is a
FORM that is constructed collectively and individually to be a container for
many things: sexual satisfaction, procreation, raising children, easing
loneliness, owning and bequeathing property, running businesses, creating
dual-units for the social system, maintaining tribal loyalties, passing down
genetic and moral codes, etc. It also is the container for subtler forms of
energy like: affection, imagination, memory, fear, faith, shared experience,
projection, joy, disappointment, hope, anger, transformation, compassion,
impatience, yearning, bliss, etc. At any given time, one or more of these
may be in ascendancy or may seem to have vanished altogether.
All these
emotions and effects may be experienced outside of marriage too, but the
accumulated power of them within the FORM of a single marriage feeds what I
will call The Marriage Body and gives it the illusion of
substance. It is now a “something” which has a past, a future and can exert
influence over people and events in the real world.
Is there
“really” a marriage body? If it “dies” the two people grieve over it as if
it were a living thing and the physical symptoms often found in divorcing
couples give strength to the idea that something has been severed or cut
off, cut out, killed. Here is how poet, Robert Bly, describes the Marriage
Body:
A man and a woman sit near each other, and they
do not long
at this moment to be older, or younger, nor born
in any other nation, or time, or place.
They are content to be where they are, talking
or not talking.
Their breaths together feed someone whom we do
not know.
The man sees the way his fingers move;
he sees her hands close around a book she hands
to him.
They obey a third body they have in common.
They have made a promise to love that body.
Age may come, parting may come, death will come.
A man and woman sit near each other;
as they breathe they feed someone we do not
know,
someone we know of, whom we have never seen.
(The Third Body by Robert Bly)
Now, you may
have experienced , or know someone who has experienced, the unsettling
sensation of waking up one morning and suddenly not recognizing your own
spouse. Or, even if you recognize the contour of the body and the face, all
feelings of marital love have simply vanished. Like a radio whose dial has
been jostled, you can’t tune in to the “we” frequency anymore. Only then do
you recognize the ephemeral nature of the Marriage Body which is entirely
based on a tacit, unconscious agreement about a shared past and an
anticipated future. It is a drama in which two co-authors are also the
stars. In that moment of lapse you inadvertently stumbled into the place
called the Present where the flow of life is all there is. Sometimes you can
jostle yourself back into the play called Our Marriage, but sometimes you
cannot, as if you “missed the tide” and that ship sailed without you. Now
you find that the reality you are tuned into places different demands on
you. It’s like finding yourself inside a different a game.
Marriage is a
FORM of the type called PLAY.
In all
successful PLAY it is necessary for the players to take on roles, agree to
goals and rules, boundaries, penalties, points, etc. Play can be exhausting,
painful, dangerous, risky, but people choose to do it because it is
basically FUN. It allows you to do those things that human beings like to do
the most: test your abilities, learn new things, be cooperative and
competitive, hang out with other human beings, see the world from different
perspectives, feel really alive.
The reason
that people say vows like “I will love you forever” or “until death do us
part” is that marriage as PLAY is more FUN and life-affirming for both
players when it is an INFINITE rather than a FINITE game.* Infinite games
are all about keeping the play of possibilities alive; finite games are
about winning and losing. If you are in a relationship where somebody always
has to win and somebody has to lose, then you are in a finite game which is
not life-affirming and ultimately, not much fun. What makes marriage such a
desirable game is its infinite quality. This does not mean that the play of
marriage that you are in has to last forever – in fact, that’s impossible.
The body forms that both players are in will eventually wear out and death
will end the game in its present form. What it means is that marriage
participates in the qualities of the infinite – meaning that if you play it,
you get a taste of what eternity is. That is worth the play! As mythologist
Joseph Campbell tried to explain to Bill Moyers:
“Eternity isn’t some later time. Eternity isn’t
even a long time.
Eternity has nothing to do with time. Eternity
is that dimension of
here and now that all thinking in temporal
terms cuts off.
And if you don’t get it here, you won’t get it
anywhere.”
The kind of eternity the Play of Marriage allows
you to experience has to do with recognizing the boundless nature of love,
compassion, forgiveness, joy and delight in another’s wellbeing. It’s sort
of like getting to play god and goddess for awhile, which is why so many
cultures treat the bride and groom as if they were the divine couple during
their wedding ceremony.
The Marriage Play is open-ended in that there is
no end point where one player wins and the other loses; its possibilities of
enjoyment and learning stretch out into infinity. The vows of fidelity
around marriage and the idea of “til death do us part” increase the
enjoyment of the game in the same way that raising the stakes do in other
games – these are the boundaries that help refine the play and keep us
focused and invested in the unfolding drama.
Now, it is fully possible to do a Divorce in such
a way that it is life-affirming for both players. That is, to keep alive the
sense of play for both partners while ending the FORM of the play they have
been in. This requires giving up the idea of winners and losers. It also
allows the soul to remain alive and interested in the proceedings, which,
when you think in terms of infinity – or even of getting through next week
-- is not a bad trade-off.
To Divorce with Soul-Based Mediation means to
understand the playful nature of all life forms and respect all your game
partners. If you finished your marriage because each of you just ran out of
chips to play or moves to make, then you could honor one another for the
amount of time and energy that each did put into making the play enjoyable;
remember the best of the times and the life lessons that came from them. If
you ended your marriage because you were like two samurai warriors and it
just became too exhausting to continue, you can still salute one another as
honorable opponents and reflect on the valuable skills you learned in such
intense and fierce play. If one of you wanted to end the game sooner than
the other, each can take comfort in the fact that opportunities to find new
FORMS of the PLAY are endless and offer themselves to us each and every day
in myriads of forms.
To help with the inevitable sadness of saying
goodbye to a game and the play partner with whom you shared so much, I offer
a succinct piece of wisdom from America’s poet laureate, Mary Oliver:
To live
in this world
you must
be able
to do
three things:
to love
what is mortal;
to hold
it
against
your bones knowing
your own
life depends on it;
and, when
the time comes to let it go,
to let it
go.
* For more on Finite and Infinite Games, see the book by
James Carse of that name. Highly recommended for giving perspective during
times of crisis.
Rev. Rebecca Armstrong
|